bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors, 2256 x 1504 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '21 at 11:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 167
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 275
26% 214 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 117
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 61.7
96% 80.6 fps
MRender 32.7
Gravity 77.5
Splatting 115
66% 75.1 fps
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 104%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 245GB
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 347 353 353 356 359 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.4% Very good
Read 446
Write 339
Mixed 372
SusWrite 350
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 19.8
75% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 54.2
96% 187 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 11.7
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 1.9
10% 3.47 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 12 10 64 14.5" 1280 701 MSH062E HyperVMonitor
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback