Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA (all builds)
Memory	117.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20201231
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '21 at 05:23
Run Duration	342 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Memory 74.8 1-Core 152 2-Core 299 93% 175 Pts	4-Core 587 8-Core 1,029 98% 808 Pts	64-Core 1,429 88% 1,429 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4013) CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Lighting 96.9 Reflection 97.7 Parallax 98.9 79% 97.8 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 85.3 Splatting 77.2 74% 92.7 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73 171,271 User benchmarks, average bench 212% 763GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1244 1392 1203 1407 1441 1434 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	239% Outstanding	Read 1,478 Write 1,433 Mixed 1,081 SusWrite 1,353 301% 1,336 MB/s	4K Read 56.5 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 69.1 237% 81.3 MB/s	DQ Read 576 DQ Write 478 DQ Mixed 264 270% 439 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 239% Great: 295%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$81 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 832GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 425 419 425 428 425 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 499 Write 420 Mixed 400 SusWrite 419 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 48.3 158% 54 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 183 140% 190 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 125%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 834GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1177 1206 1205 1208 1209 1202 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 1,388 Write 1,226 Mixed 1,180 SusWrite 1,201 281% 1,249 MB/s	4K Read 65.6 4K Write 141 4K Mixed 85.5 283% 97.2 MB/s	DQ Read 928 DQ Write 594 DQ Mixed 772 573% 765 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 435%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 333GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 445 442 447 448 447 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 438 Mixed 401 SusWrite 440 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 55.3 180% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 202 150% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 134%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280 10,028 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 2TB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 453 453 454 454 452 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 392 Mixed 425 SusWrite 451 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 37.5 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 51.3 168% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 187 DQ Mixed 193 144% 189 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 128%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164 35,257 User benchmarks, average bench 314% 722GB free Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3355 3759 3736 3749 3765 3680 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	431% Outstanding	Read 2,165 Write 3,242 Mixed 2,196 SusWrite 3,674 641% 2,819 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 161 4K Mixed 77.6 257% 95.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,108 DQ Write 691 DQ Mixed 908 674% 902 MB/s
Poor: 182% ↑ This bench: 431% Great: 472%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 4x31.8GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 4 of 4 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	96.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 38.6 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 27.2 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 40.2 89% 31.2 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 157%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	7	60	25"	1280 720	DELD06F DELL U2515H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 2,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $245Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	567x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	528x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $199Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	457x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	325x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	269x
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	194x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	263x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	185x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	144x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	146x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	62x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16