| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200107 |
| Uptime | 4.9 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 13 '21 at 01:18 |
| Run Duration | 235 Seconds |
| Run User | ARG-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.8%
Good
|
69% 121 Pts
|
49% 394 Pts
|
32% 521 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.20
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
18% 23.9 fps
|
15% 18.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 64 57 36 25 31 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
53% 238 MB/s
|
36% 14.6 MB/s
|
28% 39.9 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
387GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 149 150 149 149 149 MB/s
|
54.2%
Above average
|
49% 67.1 MB/s
|
20% 0.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BL8G26C16U4B.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.2%
Good
|
69% 24.1 GB/s
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
44% 91.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,097 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,469x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 954x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 736x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 656x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 98% - Outstanding | Total price: $352 |