Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340M 12,487 User benchmarks, average bench 53% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 81.4 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 157 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 219 30% 222 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 0532) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 3.1 4% 3.07 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 5.3 3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB 6,819 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1124A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 90 119 64 5.7 187 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 443 Write 378 Mixed 334 SusWrite 130 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 16.4 70% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 94.9 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 26.1 64% 129 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 211%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A 320GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 51GB free Firmware: ES2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 18 17 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 15.5 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 17.6 15% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KFYHV1-HYC Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.1% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 17.3 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.5 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	227x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	6x
RX 460AMD $90Bench 20%, 64,240 samples	2x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	6x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	4x

RAM
SODIM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 973 samples	9x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	9x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GBSamsungBench 40%, 133 samples	7x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $199