Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-V  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130424
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '21 at 09:54
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.4% Good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 122
63% 99 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 212
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.10.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 58.3
Reflection 60.1
Parallax 79.5
48% 66 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 61.3
Splatting 44
44% 55.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0727A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 231 210 219 198 197 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.9% Good
Read 252
Write 240
Mixed 233
SusWrite 209
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 36.3
118% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 111
108% 172 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-V Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback