Asus A88XM-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive91% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus A88XM-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '21 at 17:25
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 71.6
1-Core 65
2-Core 130
53% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 191
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9
Parallax 10.3
6% 8.9 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 8
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S210712b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 352 368 380 386 374 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 407
Mixed 392
SusWrite 360
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 39
136% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 237
175% 230 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 91%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
582GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 209 217 220 218 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 204
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 9905471-084.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 16.1
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11.5
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A88XM-PLUS Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88XM-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback