QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '21 at 19:22
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core (Broadwell, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 88
2-Core 183
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 702
63% 530 Pts
64-Core 3018
187% 3018 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.9% Good
Lighting 76
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 72
62% 75.5 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 71.6
59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 537GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 390 406 381 363 397 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 65
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 43
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.3
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 118%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $288Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback