bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
Motherboard 051XDX
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 23:46
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2407 0
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 69.9
35% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 216
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 34D5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.44% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.44%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H710 12TB
10.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 223 218 224 244 220 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 598
Write 268
Mixed 253
SusWrite 225
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1.4
22% 7.43 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 4
17% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9KSF25672AZ-1G4M1 3x2GB
3 of 12 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback