Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 213E
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '21 at 14:54
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	81%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4300U 36,631 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 45.4 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 87.6 35% 59.2 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 191 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 58%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256MAZ-1AE1ZABHA 256GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: M104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 202 185 188 174 183 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.8% Above average	Read 327 Write 184 Mixed 194 SusWrite 186 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 39.6 4K Mixed 18.1 54% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 309 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 148 138% 216 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT851S6AMR6R-PB 1x4GB 212 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 8.5 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 7 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	24x
HD 5000 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 6,906 samples	1x

SSD
X110 SATA M.2 256GBSanDiskBench 76%, 2,150 samples	11x
IT L8T-256L9G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 81%, 601 samples	3x
860 EVO M.2 500GBSamsungBench 101%, 35,237 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173QHY-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 94 samples	5x
HMT451B6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173QHY-YK0 8GBHynixBench 48%, 173 samples	5x
M471B5173QHY-YK0 Micron 8KTS51264HDZ-1G6E1 8GBSamsungBench 47%, 36 samples	4x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16