Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1660 0 1,746 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 171 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 528 53% 431 Pts	64-Core 710 44% 710 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 86%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 112 110 113 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 376 Write 127 Mixed 178 SusWrite 109 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 24.1 4K Mixed 18.2 69% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 75.6 DQ Mixed 97.1 74% 101 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 81%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 451GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 119 120 120 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 123 Write 122 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 119 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B1K70BM1-CH9 M392B1K70BM1-CH9 M392B1K70BM1-CH9 M392B1K70CM0-CH9 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	82.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 30.2 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.7 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	496x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	307x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16