HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ENVY 17 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1966
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '21 at 20:53
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 96
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 471
49% 395 Pts
64-Core 471
29% 471 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
HP(103C 1966) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 6
Parallax 9.4
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,472
Write 3,984
Mixed 3,834
913% 4,096 MB/s
4K Read 383
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 213
948% 258 MB/s
DQ Read 740
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 480
379% 537 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ENVY 17 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 1,079 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ENVY 17 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $289
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback