Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z490M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z490M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJul 11 '22 at 19:25
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$285
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 151
2-Core 295
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 1,011
92% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,996
124% 1,996 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 152
Parallax 153
126% 153 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 130
Splatting 115
114% 144 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,495
Write 1,629
Mixed 1,256
326% 1,460 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 62.9
206% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 696
DQ Mixed 847
630% 841 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
48GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 141 127 126 113 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 440
Write 292
Mixed 294
SusWrite 136
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 30.5
121% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 350
255% 333 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$175
365GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 461 432 416 407 401 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 410
Mixed 365
SusWrite 429
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 32.4
127% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 354
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$129
236GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1484 1426 1408 1208 1268 1268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,513
Write 1,830
Mixed 1489
SusWrite 1,344
349% 1,544 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 69.8
220% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1045
DQ Write 738
DQ Mixed 928
683% 904 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 251%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 18.5
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z490M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $809
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback