MSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '21 at 10:35
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 178
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 264
35% 263 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 7817) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 4.3
2% 3.27 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mllse 256GB 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW210521
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 354 373 340 320 330 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 477
Write 387
Mixed 338
SusWrite 336
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 15
122% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 20.1
67% 142 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
466GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 119 119 120 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 118
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-052.A00LF 99P5474-013.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 15.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 18.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E34 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 1,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E34 (MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback