Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Memory 35.4 1-Core 53.2 2-Core 109 36% 65.9 Pts	4-Core 217 8-Core 216 29% 216 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 0000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.27% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.6 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 3.2 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5.5 3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.27% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S539N8/256GMN 256GB 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 396 417 335 172 177 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	77.8% Very good	Read 495 Write 425 Mixed 408 SusWrite 314 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 19.9 101% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 92.7 DQ Write 309 DQ Mixed 27.6 71% 143 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KT8GS4KE8 1x8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,042x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16