Asus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive635% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
MotherboardAsus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '22 at 23:43
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 92%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$297
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 77.6
1-Core 215
2-Core 425
123% 239 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,565
142% 1,193 Pts
64-Core 2994
185% 2994 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
EVGA(3842 4663) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 176
Parallax 165
148% 174 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 136
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 614600WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4232 4673 4656 4678 4680 2755 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
635% Outstanding
Read 4,717
Write 4,626
Mixed 3,071
SusWrite 4279
939% 4,173 MB/s
4K Read 82.1
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 109
398% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,586
DQ Write 1,236
DQ Mixed 1,438
1,068% 1,420 MB/s
Poor: 242%
This bench: 635%
Great: 594%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
111GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 259 236 230 224 223 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 482
Mixed 455
SusWrite 270
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 48.7
165% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 145
119% 175 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 129%
Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB-$503
15GB free
Firmware: M311
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 160 141 95 110 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 297
Write 183
Mixed 241
SusWrite 135
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 52.5
4K Mixed 26.2
96% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 54.7
DQ Mixed 81.7
75% 121 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
263GB free
Firmware: CC54
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 71.3
Mixed 61.7
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
241GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 29 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 10.4
Write 32.5
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 28.5
18% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
65% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair K32GX5M2A4800C40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
157% Outstanding
MC Read 64.2
MC Write 61.9
MC Mixed 57.9
175% 61.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 26.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 157%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 1,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 239%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 280%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt Z690-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback