Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (69%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '22 at 17:57
Run Duration	759 Seconds
Run User	LUX-User
Background CPU	69%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 59.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 221 69% 129 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 548 56% 450 Pts	64-Core 903 56% 903 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 89%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 284GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1223 1309 1642 1474 1390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	203% Outstanding	Read 1,336 Write 1561 Mixed 819 SusWrite 1,422 290% 1,285 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 63.7 4K Mixed 40.4 135% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 548 DQ Write 374 DQ Mixed 465 346% 462 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 393%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 169 161 169 160 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 111 Write 161 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 164 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.8 222% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 143 149 139 150 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 84.5 Write 62.5 Mixed 72.5 SusWrite 147 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 186% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 90%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 29.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 127 128 127 122 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 69 Write 99.5 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 122 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 105%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 87 Write 106 Mixed 65.7 SusWrite 12.8 89% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 4.3 4.5 4 4.4 5 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	8.89% Terrible	Read 19.7 Write 9.2 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 5 13% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.3 65% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 8.89% Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 13 13 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 73 Write 119 Mixed 76.8 SusWrite 12.8 96% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.1 6.5 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 120 Write 94 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 6.9 99% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 120% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	9.38% Terrible	Read 25.7 Write 58 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 12.8 48% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.3 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 9.38% Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 58.2 Write 58.2 Mixed 47.2 SusWrite 12.8 57% 44.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 13 13 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 70.5 Write 86.5 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 12.7 75% 57 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 70%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 85 69 81 64 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	31.7% Below average	Read 78.5 Write 113 Mixed 46.7 SusWrite 84.5 111% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 31% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 15,511 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	97x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $826

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)