Today's hottest deals

Gateway FX6840

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.84% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemGateway FX6840  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FX6840
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime14.3 Days
Run DateJan 23 '22 at 02:42
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 93.9
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 155
68% 111 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 361
41% 320 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
PwrHis(1787 7250) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 13.7
7% 11.5 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 8.8
7% 8.47 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 16 28 46 34 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 85
Write 80.3
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 32.5
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
221GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 20 31 48 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 49.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 47
SusWrite 36.9
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
676GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 19 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 22.5
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 18.4
27% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 43%
Maxtor Basics Portable 320GB
78GB free, PID 7450
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 22.3
Mixed 20
SusWrite 18.2
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 12.9
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX6840 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Gateway FX6840

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback