IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemIBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00MV214
Memory180.1 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140917
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '22 at 08:06
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 63.4
2-Core 147
58% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 485
40% 348 Pts
64-Core 2,270
140% 2,270 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 599GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 77 74 76 77 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 107
Write 34.3
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 73
15% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 0
9% 4.87 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 3.1
4% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 432%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3.34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1034 1003 1004 1000 997 1001 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
227% Outstanding
Read 2,469
Write 2,507
Mixed 2,469
SusWrite 1,006
475% 2,113 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 55.9
171% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 282
213% 284 MB/s
Poor: 227%
This bench: 227%
Great: 244%
IFT A16E-G2130-4 23TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 373N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 87 89 89 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.9% Poor
Read 96.7
Write 97.2
Mixed 97.7
SusWrite 88.7
22% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 12.2
41% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 42.4
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 98.1
65% 75.9 MB/s
IBM 2145 16.5TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 163 167 162 165 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C-RD M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70EB0-CMA M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70... 192GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.3% Outstanding
MC Read 47.8
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 36
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]- Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: IBM System x3650 M4: -[7915JMC]-

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $4,000
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback