bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '22 at 21:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X 12-Core
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.3% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 245
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 444
63% 465 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 590
Device(0000 0000)
Driver: Ver. 10.0.19041.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.8% Good
Lighting 86.8
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 100
71% 87.7 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 51.8
53% 66.9 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 56 56 59 91 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 51.4
Write 64.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 70.9
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 8GB
0, 0 MHz
3072, 5120 MB
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 19.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback