Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite C650D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '22 at 20:25
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-50
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Memory 19
1-Core 10.8
2-Core 14.7
10% 14.8 Pts
4-Core 14.4
8-Core 16.3
2% 15.3 Pts
64-Core 19.2
1% 19.2 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Toshiba(1179 FDE8) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple HDD ST500LM012 500GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR30007
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 47 86 72 89 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 82.4
Write 96.5
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 72.9
54% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 2
MC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.4 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 2.6
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 328
12% 328 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $45
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback