Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
Motherboardhttp://www.abit.com.tw/ AB9/AB9RPO(Intel965+ICH8)
Memory1.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20061011
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 29 '22 at 01:33
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6300-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 0.7 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 70.6
1-Core 24.2
2-Core 48
34% 47.6 Pts
4-Core 47.1
8-Core 46.7
6% 46.9 Pts
64-Core 46.8
3% 46.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO
XFX(1682 2388) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.81
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 2.4
3% 3.5 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 5
Splatting 2.8
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hds728080pla380 40Y9028LEN 80GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PF2OA65A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 16 8.6 8 21 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 42.8
Write 36.9
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 15
23% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 3 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback