bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210722
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '22 at 18:30
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8370C
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 81.3
43% 67.9 Pts
4-Core 83.9
8-Core 79.5
11% 81.7 Pts
64-Core 74.8
5% 74.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 81GB
72GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 109 89 90 82 84 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 199
Write 220
Mixed 219
SusWrite 90.6
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 11.4
39% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 33.5
24% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 87%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 72 96 96 102 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 97%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 137GB
118GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 14 13 13 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 16GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 15360 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 5.5
24% 8.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 5.7
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback