Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5731

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5731 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3024-A1
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110421
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '15 at 04:36
Run Duration	587 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6300-$66 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 45 2-Core 92 31% 68.5 Pts	4-Core 92.9 8-Core 92.3 12% 92.6 Pts	64-Core 92.5 6% 92.5 Pts
Poor: 23% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express-Chipsatz 11 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 114C) Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.43% Terrible	Lighting 0.53 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.53 0% 0.52 fps	MRender 0.29 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.49 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.43% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20 5,436 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP1OA3CF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 98 (03) Spinup time 120 120 12897419456 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1522 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 12921 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1519 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1619 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1619 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 188979544098 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.7% Above average	Read 108 Write 100 Mixed 75.7 71% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.27 67% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 75%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 18GB free Firmware: 10.01E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 165 2125 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15118 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 31 31 51061 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6481 (BE) vendor-specific 72 45 28 (C2) HDA temperature 115 88 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	26.1% Poor	Read 49.8 Write 40.8 Mixed 38.3 32% 43 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.31 72% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 33%
Intenso Rainbow Line 32GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 24GB free, PID 0817 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.29% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 12.4 Mixed 12.7 19% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.69 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.09 20% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 11%
SanDisk Cruzer 64GB 3,567 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 6GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	8.82% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 4.6 Mixed 5.1 9% 9.06 MB/s	4K Read 3.58 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 1.01 97% 2.01 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.82% Great: 17%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 0304 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 8.97 Mixed 2.78 11% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.64 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.03 27% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO E5731 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5731

CPU
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	8x
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	3x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	7x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	3x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 73%, 5,673 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	6x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	5x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $109

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5731

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E5731

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)