Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '22 at 04:31
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 85.6 2-Core 170 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 490 51% 407 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.1 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.3% Average	Lighting 59.9 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 85.3 49% 69.8 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 47.4 47% 59.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253LE120G 120GB 3,175 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 164 62 63 63 63 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	66.6% Good	Read 361 Write 269 Mixed 266 SusWrite 114 56% 253 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 27.7 118% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 200 DQ Mixed 148 129% 191 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 85%
Clover CN-M750MBB 750GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 150GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 56 35 30 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 42.9 Write 14.1 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 36.4 21% 29 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 59%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 4TB 834 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4GB free Firmware: 1404 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 261 Write 201 Mixed 162 155% 208 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 3 666% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KRE-D3U1600M/4G Kingston 9905403-547.A00LF SH564128FH8N0QNSCR 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	44.6% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16