PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 25.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3P (all builds) |
Memory | 1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160226 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '17 at 07:22 |
Run Duration | 546 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.3%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8586) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.01E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
31.1%
Below average
|
|||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
14GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
6.17%
Terrible
|
|||
USB Flash Memory 2GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
2.55%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 230x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 224x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 147x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 47x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 46x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $645 |