Today's hottest deals

Asus A55M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A55M-E  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20141208
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
FM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 88
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 95.1
55% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 94.6
8-Core 95.9
13% 95.2 Pts
64-Core 85.5
5% 85.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7540D
Asus(1043 8526) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3
Splatting 3.4
3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 85 80 68 77 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 79.9
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 79.5
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
25.7% Poor
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.8
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.5
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 69.6
58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55M-E Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback