Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '22 at 15:43
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3350G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 55.6
1-Core 107
2-Core 228
68% 130 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 588
61% 493 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 25.6
15% 19.5 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 13.4
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
379GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 155 133 65 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 458
Write 252
Mixed 340
SusWrite 124
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 81.5
4K Mixed 40.2
147% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 220
188% 272 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.7% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback