Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$188 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 76.5 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 165 64% 110 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 354 40% 316 Pts	64-Core 360 22% 360 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2003) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.97% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.1 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.5 1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.97% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF510000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 400 Write 274 Mixed 299 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 15.3 50% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 70.6 DQ Mixed 28.3 39% 71.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9DHTBNZB-HATP 9DHTBNZB-HATP 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 14.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.8 SC Mixed 10.7 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,041x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	824x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16