Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 19:52
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 132
58% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 370
38% 307 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 6.2
5% 17.8 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 969
Write 872
Mixed 740
192% 860 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 49.2
166% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 431
DQ Mixed 516
398% 549 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
657GB free
Firmware: LXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 154 152 152 154 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 68.7
Write 90.4
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 151
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 17.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback