Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 7070

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7070
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7070  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '22 at 12:01
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$225
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 255
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 905
84% 698 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 430
Dell(1028 1711) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.09.04.04
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 9.2
5% 6.9 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 4.4
4% 5.47 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT500P 500GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 199 65 66 67 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 902
Write 190
Mixed 115
SusWrite 141
73% 337 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 36
131% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 541
DQ Write 59.6
DQ Mixed 91
120% 230 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 243%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
7TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 100 103 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 124
Write 103
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 101
139% 105 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.5
227% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 103%
WD My Passport 2626 4TB
833GB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 69.9
Write 70.6
Mixed 52
SusWrite 68.8
89% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 62%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB
233GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 62 46 43 43 29 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 142
Write 58.8
Mixed 65.4
SusWrite 47.2
92% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.4
120% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 859B0000802C CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 80AD000080AD HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 859B0000802C CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.8% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 24.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 30.7
SC Mixed 24.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7070 Builds (Compare 1,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7070

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback