Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 14:43
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
18% Very poor
Memory 24.8
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 34
16% 25.3 Pts
4-Core 62.9
8-Core 83.1
9% 73 Pts
64-Core 84.6
5% 84.6 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 18%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Lighting 29.7
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 40.3
24% 33.1 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 711 431 360 230 288 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 1,092
Write 859
Mixed 767
SusWrite 387
173% 776 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 20.1
78% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 136
101% 134 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 16.4
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 287
14% 287 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback