Asus H61M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-K (all builds)
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '22 at 06:54
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 94 1-Core 63.4 2-Core 135 61% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 224 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.48% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 5 Parallax 1.9 4% 3.73 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 3.6 3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.48% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD120G(120GB) 120GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0707A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 148 151 150 145 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.7% Below average	Read 185 Write 160 Mixed 162 SusWrite 148 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 12.1 58% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 89.2 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 25.1 43% 82.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 91%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 320GB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 226GB free Firmware: 0214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 23 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 23.8 15% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 5,657 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.6% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 10.6 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.9 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 59.8 67% 59.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,325 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	332x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	266x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	188x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	441x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	147x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	112x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	65x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	49x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	48x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16