Today's hottest deals

Chuwi HiGame

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemChuwi HiGame  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI HiGame
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180910
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 07 '22 at 11:45
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8709G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 465
54% 418 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GH
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1190 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 64
Parallax 59.2
35% 55.3 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 46.5
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 283 200 243 250 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,547
Write 550
Mixed 649
SusWrite 254
164% 750 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 44.7
155% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 433
268% 302 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 136%
Great: 244%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$250
1TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 461 458 457 461 452 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 456
Mixed 369
SusWrite 455
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51.3
175% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 355
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 26.2
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.8
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HiGame Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Chuwi HiGame

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $33
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback