Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte H370M D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H370M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte H370M D3H  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 08:53
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$145
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 262
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 855
83% 683 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.2% Above average
Lighting 63.5
Reflection 68
Parallax 62.6
52% 64.7 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 67
Splatting 62.5
53% 65.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$240
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 139 149 147 145 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 445
Write 156
Mixed 145
SusWrite 145
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 22.2
91% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 147
128% 195 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 122%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
87GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 415 421 432 435 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 410
Mixed 416
SusWrite 429
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 42.9
146% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 256
211% 303 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 22.2
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 26.4
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370M D3H-CF Builds (Compare 594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370M D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $450
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback