Today's hottest deals

Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM6330_CM6630_CM6730_CM6830
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateMar 13 '22 at 22:20
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 510
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Asus(1043 83D7) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.94% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 0.5
2% 2 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.94%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$60
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 93 110 101 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 113
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 98.2
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 68%
USB DISK 252GB
234GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 27 27 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 32.7
Write 25
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 26.8
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.3
148% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata EL64C1C1624Z1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
57.9% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM6630_CM6730_CM6830. Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM6630_CM6730_CM6830.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback