Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '17 at 10:30
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 207
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 474
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 372.54
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 72
Parallax 63.3
51% 65.9 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 68.6
Splatting 67.9
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SVP200S 90GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 501A
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 155
Write 66.7
Mixed 97.9
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 6.77
39% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 72.5
DQ Write 79
DQ Mixed 24.2
32% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 51%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
252GB free
Firmware: 05.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 151
Write 125
Mixed 120
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.35
89% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 85%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
183GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 23.8
Mixed 16.9
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.16
54% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 89.9
44% 89.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback