Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M740 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3348-A1
Memory	54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190729
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '22 at 23:44
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 82 1-Core 83.1 2-Core 167 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 644 56% 480 Pts	64-Core 860 53% 860 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2000 13,526 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 094C) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 462.96 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	7.35% Terrible	Lighting 8.2 Reflection 10.4 Parallax 8.4 7% 9 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 9.5 9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.35% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 226GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 409 406 405 411 407 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 413 Write 418 Mixed 345 SusWrite 406 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 36.8 123% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 7.5TB 106 User benchmarks, average bench 162% 6.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 35 33 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Read 126 Write 24.8 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 32.9 39% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 53% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 211%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 7.5TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 7TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 24 23 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Read 215 Write 15.5 Mixed 21 SusWrite 22.9 50% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 164%
Seagate Portable 1TB 1,255 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 9GB free, PID 2300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.9 4.5 7.5 6.2 4.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.29% Terrible	Read 10.3 Write 10 Mixed 8 SusWrite 5.3 11% 8.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 11% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 3.29% Great: 17%
WD Game Drive 5TB 2,065 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 78GB free, PID 262f Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 16 14 12 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	5.54% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 14.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 14.7 17% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 5.54% Great: 66%
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 5TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 9GB free, PID 3940 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 15 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.16% Terrible	Read 7.5 Write 15.8 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 15.4 20% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.1 45% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.16% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TFT1 4x16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 51.7 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 43.7 130% 45.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 18.1 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M740 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M740

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	22x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	12x
Xeon E5-1620 v4IntelBench 77%, 3,243 samples	7x

GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	13x
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	12x
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	7x

SSD
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK256MBFZ 256GBBench 90%, 162 samples	6x
MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GBSamsungBench 98%, 467 samples	6x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	5x

RAM
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	7x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 66%, 1,144 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 9% - Terrible

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16