PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 24.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Kllisre X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200606 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 31 '22 at 02:38 |
Run Duration | 176 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
P3-256 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 164 0.8 79 0.9 88 MB/s
|
24.1%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
92GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 64 63 64 65 MB/s
|
44.6%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
15GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 29 34 29 36 MB/s
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
10GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 4.7 6.2 7.7 6.5 6.5 MB/s
|
8.29%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7BFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C HMT151R7TFR4C 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 67x |
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples | 63x |
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 20x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 20x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 39% - Below average | Total price: $198 |