| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 58 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190925 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 16 '22 at 03:30 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel 0000%@
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
83%
Excellent
|
84% 153 Pts
|
82% 697 Pts
|
105% 1,693 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 938 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.1%
Below average
|
37% 50.5 fps
|
32% 40.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 89 108 110 113 114 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
77% 105 MB/s
|
174% 1.33 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot 3600 C18 Series 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.3%
Very good
|
81% 28.3 GB/s
|
41% 14.4 GB/s
|
50% 80.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,775 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7800XIntel $204Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 524x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $195Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 290x |
| Core i9-7900XIntel $325Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 158x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 177x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 160x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 101x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 107% - Outstanding | Total price: $541 |