Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime26.4 Days
Run DateApr 06 '22 at 19:02
Run Duration450 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$143
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 465
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 726
45% 726 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.15
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 0
17% 17.9 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 27
Splatting 20
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 18%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SX950 240GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0125A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 96 69 64 68 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 381
Write 274
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 85.4
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 30.1
84% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 57.6
88% 170 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 112%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
149GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1305 1412 869 580 553 555 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1388
Write 1,446
Mixed 1,370
SusWrite 879
286% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 39.4
141% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 413
DQ Mixed 587
428% 566 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 177%
Great: 347%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
692GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 185 187 189 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 167
Write 141
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 186
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 102%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
158GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 118 118 119 118 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 156
Write 105
Mixed 73
SusWrite 118
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FAR 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 40.1
MC Mixed 31.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $939
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback