Lenovo 20156

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20156  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Emerald Lake 2
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 09:07
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1000M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Memory 29.7
1-Core 36.5
2-Core 58.2
25% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 80
8-Core 66.7
10% 73.3 Pts
64-Core 90.9
6% 90.9 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.53 fps
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.45 fps
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 324 334 312 294 333 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 347
Write 344
Mixed 288
SusWrite 318
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 23.2
80% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 39.1
33% 47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMTS4G58DFRID-16K 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 8.2
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 6.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 257
16% 257 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20156 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20156

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $141
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback