Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-V  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111026
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '22 at 05:09
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$142
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 291
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1500
Nvidia(10DE 032C) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 307.45
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L7 EVO SSD 120GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V2.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 298
Write 221
Mixed 209
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 9.3
64% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 77.2
DQ Mixed 15.2
22% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 64%
Fujitsu MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
268GB free
Firmware: 00000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 52.8
Write 53.3
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 53.7
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
10GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 7.5 4.2 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 7.3
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 9.1
19% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
98% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback