Today's hottest deals

HP 100-5155

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 100-5155  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AAE
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '22 at 20:59
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 260u
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.1% Poor
Memory 41.7
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 51.2
26% 39.9 Pts
4-Core 51.3
8-Core 48.3
7% 49.8 Pts
64-Core 51
3% 51 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4270
HP(103C 2AAE) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.733.0.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 1.3
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$23
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 94 98 90 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 79.2
Write 43
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 92.2
42% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 195
21% 195 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 100-5155 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 100-5155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback