Today's hottest deals

Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '17 at 00:39
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$73
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 129
59% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 204
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Lighting 27.9
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 31.2
23% 29.7 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 27.4
Splatting 34.8
26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722010CLA 1TB
867GB free
Firmware: JP4O
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 132
Mixed 128
98% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.41
104% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$60
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0005
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 57.6
Write 54.7
Mixed 59.4
43% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.29
67% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback