Today's hottest deals

MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D22
MotherboardMSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 21:27
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G5925
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 88.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 147
71% 114 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 161
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 149
9% 149 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
Asus(1043 04AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 26.5
Reflection 28.5
Parallax 36.9
22% 30.6 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 26.8
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$25
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0918A0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 216 302 397 480 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 872
Write 685
Mixed 586
SusWrite 293
136% 609 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 15.8
92% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 331
257% 352 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GIS 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22) Builds (Compare 8,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI H510M-A PRO (MS-7D22)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback