Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za) 922 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Memory 25 1-Core 11.5 2-Core 17.6 13% 18 Pts	4-Core 24.9 8-Core 25.1 3% 25 Pts	64-Core 26.6 2% 26.6 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290 821 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 397F) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Husky 128GB 128GB 257 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: ZD0R025N SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 206 203 302 187 159 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 268 Write 288 Mixed 263 SusWrite 215 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 9.1 4K Write 13.8 4K Mixed 9.5 33% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 70 DQ Write 59.6 DQ Mixed 58.2 45% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HB3SU002GFM8MML16 HB3SU002GFM8MMC16 4GB 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.12% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.4 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.23 GB/s	Latency 286 14% 286 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 22%, 922 samples	9x

GPU
Radeon HD 7290AMDBench 1%, 821 samples	6x
Radeon HD 7290MAMDBench 1%, 25 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
480GB 480GBSSDBench 65%, 2,159 samples	1x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	1x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDG 1x4GBSmartBench 29%, 675 samples	3x
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	1x
M471B5173CB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 1,808 samples	1x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16