Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 191
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 386
45% 351 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.04
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 20.7
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.5
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU655 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 229a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 410 403 287 106 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 387
Mixed 378
SusWrite 277
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 42.8
168% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 175
136% 183 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 94%
GB0250EAFJF 250GB
205GB free
Firmware: HPGA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 101
Write 37.5
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 37.3
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 60%
ST320LT0 20-9YG142 320GB
185GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
8.22% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 15.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 18.5
23% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
28% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.22%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 64D0JKHHJ PSD38G16002 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.7% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 4,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback