Today's hottest deals

Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211019
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 25 '22 at 02:54
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
61% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 116
54% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 348
35% 284 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700
XFX(1682 314A) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 9.5
7% 8.37 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 6.9
6% 7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-128 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 417 129 297 182 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 1,379
Write 466
Mixed 591
SusWrite 256
148% 673 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 23.3
118% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 325
246% 332 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 120%
Great: 173%
Xraydisk 128GB 128GB
3GB free
Firmware: FW201105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 165
Mixed 59.8
48% 225 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 12
65% 19.3 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 19.2
57% 118 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm2_Manufacturer Dimm6_Manufacturer 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.6% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.6
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback