Average Bench: 14.1% (238th of 700)

more Based on 79,894 user benchmarks.  Devices: 1002 699F, 1002 67FF Models: Radeon RX 550, Radeon(TM) RX 550, AMD Radeon(TM) RX550, Radeon (TM) RX 550, Radeon RX550/550, ASUS Radeon RX 550

Hot on the heels of the release of the Radeon RX 580 and RX 570 launched earlier this week, AMD have released a new Polaris 12 GPU, the Radeon RX 550. It is a sub-$100 entry level GPU, targeted at those who want an inexpensive, low profile, low power and low performance component for mini desktop PCs or a minor upgrade on integrated GPUs. It has just 8 compute units, a boost clock of 1183 MHz and comes with either 2 or 4 Gb of GDDR5 memory capable of delivering up to 112 GB/s bandwidth. As expected from a discrete GPU, the RX 550 wipes the floor with Intel’s current best desktop iGPU (HD 630 (Kaby Lake). The RX 550 is expected to be around 70% as fast as the only $20 dearer RX 560 (the successor to the RX 460 to be released next month), however this should be sufficient for an okay gaming experience for many games on non-demanding settings. It is anticipated, that AMD will tailor the form of the 550 more towards the laptop market as the year progresses. [Apr '17 GPUPro]

Terrible average bench

The AMD RX 550 averaged 85.8% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 15.5fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 22.3fps

Excellent consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX 550 is just 3.42%. This is an extremely narrow range which indicates that the AMD RX 550 performs superbly consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 25.7fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 21.4fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 79,894 samples)
Min Avg Max
13.3 Lighting 15.5 17.7
20 Reflection 25.7 28.2
18.8 Parallax 21.4 24.2
12.7% 20.9 fps
Min Avg Max
13.9 MRender 23.2 26.5
14.7 Gravity 16.5 18.8
17.8 Splatting 22.3 25.7
17.1% 20.7 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 24.2
14% 22.4 fps
MRender 23.5
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 22.6
18% 21.6 fps
Sapphire(1DA2 E371) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 22.3
14% 22.1 fps
MRender 25.1
Gravity 17
Splatting 25.1
18% 22.4 fps
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.5.1
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 22.3
14% 22.1 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 24.8
18% 22 fps
Gigabyte(1458 22FE) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.5.2
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 21.9
13% 22 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 25.2
19% 22.6 fps
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12029.10015
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 19.3
Parallax 14.7
7% 14.3 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 16.5
12% 14.4 fps
79,894 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 61,551,147 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards (based on 79,894 benchmarks)

If you buy via one of these links, our site may earn a commission.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $79 @ launch in Apr '17)
AMD(1002 0B04) 36% 14% ± 1%
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 20% 15% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0513) 6% 14% ± 1%
MSI(1462 8A90) 6% 13% ± 1%
XFX(1682 9550) 5% 15% ± 1%
HP(103C 841E) 4% 13% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 5001) 3% 15% ± 0%
AMD(1002 0000) 3% 14% ± 1%
Asus(1043 0511) 2% 14% ± 1%
ASRock(1849 5037) 2% 15% ± 1%
HP(103C 8424) 2% 14% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0551) 1% 15% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 2390) 1% 15% ± 1%
Dell(1028 1712) 1% 14% ± 0%
AMD(1002 BD20) 1% 15% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 22FE) 1% 15% ± 0%
Device(1816 BD14) 1% 13% ± 0%
Asus(1043 0553) 1% 14% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 22F3) 1% 14% ± 0%
Gigabyte(1458 22F2) 1% 16% ± 1%
PowerColor(148C 2380) 1% 14% ± 1%
Gigabyte(1458 230B) 0% 16% ± 1%
HP(103C 90FA) 0% 15% ± 0%
Device(1642 1693) 0% 14% ± 0%
Device(1816 BD20) 0% 14% ± 0%
Device(1B0A 90FC) 0% 15% ± 0%
Sapphire(1DA2 E371) 0% 15% ± 0%
Device(1545 0550) 0% 13% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX 550 Builds (Compare 7,502 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $301

Popular RX 550 compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2023 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

Added 6 years ago.

Good

2 month ago.

It is very slow and it can only do some things, but if you like to play games or edit videos etc. then you had better buy a better one.


Good

1 month ago.

low price, but not really good performances


Good

8 months ago.

4Gb GDDR5 VRAM is much better than no dedicated vram .


Good

11 months ago.

can provide up to 8k viewing and supports enough games within fps limits


Good

9 months ago.

It is cheap, can play lots of game on 4k on lowest setiing


Excellent

28 days ago.

Very bad performance, not even close to enough for a gamer in 2022


Poor

5 months ago.

uking gpu so expensive yet so slow


Terrible

7 months ago.

Cheaper, less heat, and still a budget gaming option


Good

2 years ago.

good graphics card for a budget


Good

2 months ago.

Best buy GTA VI 600 FPS, CYBERPUNK 1000 FPS


Good

6 years ago.


Terrible

21 months ago.

this is good for game only non hard cord games


Terrible

2 years ago.

Such a bad gpu and works terrible.


Excellent

5 years ago.

Great card for an Optiplex 990 SFF. It´s 50W so it doesn´t affect your stock PSU of 240W. Plus after digging on the web 50W is the limit the PCI Express Port can deliver on these machines. Other high end options consume 75W which can kill your psu.


Excellent

11 months ago.

it can run COD Cold War on Minimum


Average

3 years ago.

Performed marginally better than GT 1030 GDDR5 (not that scammy DDR4 version which is much weaker than you thought!) while consuming 20W more than GT 1030. This GPU isn't worth buying a little due to option to use AMD Ryzen APU such as Ryzen 3 2200G instead of this and slightly worse power consumption (plus slightly higher build cost).


Good

2 years ago.

handles games from 2012 down very well. Over kill if you are looking to play nostalgic games. like command and conquer 3, half life 2 and those around that time realm


Average

11 months ago.

OC editions can clock up to 1400Mhz and higher with no side effects making this a far better budget contender than the specs suggest. If you want a cheap GPU to play Minecraft or other modest games on this will do the job just fine. Ended up giving it to one of my children who has been using it for digital art and animation and also streaming, the card hasn't skipped a beat.


Average

12 months ago.

A good low-tier card for work and for multimedia. Also, is very cheap.


Excellent

4 years ago.

I got for about $70 at Best Buy and it's fantastic for what I got.


Excellent

2 years ago.

An affordable option for itx cases. Good graphics up to 1080p. It runs quite good all games (need to reduce resolution on several games9


Good

2 years ago.

Replaced my GT630 with the 2g version of this and it completely changed my gaming experience. If you have a potato like me this might be what you need.


Your
opinion?
700 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $300Nvidia RTX 3060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12600K $225Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $300Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $86
Intel Core i5-12400F $150Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback