Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 02 '22 at 06:25
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 75.1
1-Core 148
2-Core 294
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 1024
92% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,420
88% 1,420 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$334
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 139
Parallax 235
98% 165 fps
MRender 225
Gravity 127
Splatting 151
135% 168 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Innovation IT 1TB
612GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0618A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.1 4.1 4.5 5.5 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 493
Write 89.6
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 4.6
32% 150 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 6
DQ Mixed 0.2
21% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 203 217 206 218 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 182
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 212
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FE 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 31.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 90.2
44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,056 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $337
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback